Prediction of Greer Stevens vs Betsy Nagelsen Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Stevens vs B. Nagelsen

Greer Stevens

RSA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Betsy Nagelsen

USA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Stevens 3 - 0 Nagelsen

They have played 8 sets in total, with Greer Stevens winning 6 and Betsy Nagelsen winning 2. The last match between Greer Stevens and Betsy Nagelsen was at the Montreal, 14-07-1980, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Greer Stevens getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Stevens	3
Nagelsen	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R4) Montreal(07-14-80)

Stats

Greer Stevens

Betsy Nagelsen

(R4) Sydney(11-14-77)

Stats

Greer Stevens

Betsy Nagelsen

(R3) Beckenham(06-09-75)

Stats

Greer Stevens

Betsy Nagelsen

G. Stevens vs B. Nagelsen H2H Profile

G. Stevens	Stats	B. Nagelsen
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
61.51% (147-92)	Career Total W/L	48.97% (356-371)
2	Grass	0
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	2
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

G. Stevens vs B. Nagelsen Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Greer Stevens has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Greer Stevens, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Greer Stevens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Betsy Nagelsen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Greer Stevens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Betsy Nagelsen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Greer Stevens has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 77% (W/L 44/13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/5). Betsy Nagelsen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 77% (W/L 89/59), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 90/108).
Player level: In the last year, Greer Stevens has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Betsy Nagelsen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Greer Stevens winning 3 times and Betsy Nagelsen being victorious 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Greer Stevens winning 6 and Betsy Nagelsen winning 2.
The last match between Greer Stevens and Betsy Nagelsen was at the Montreal, 14-07-1980, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Greer Stevens getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Greer Stevens has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Betsy Nagelsen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Greer Stevens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Greer Stevens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Betsy Nagelsen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Greer Stevens vs Betsy Nagelsen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. Stevens vs B. Nagelsen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. Stevens	Stats	B. Nagelsen
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	2
44	Games Won	26
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (2/2)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

G. Stevens Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney - 01-12-1980
R3 Barbara HallquistB. Hallquist	W	6-0 6-3	Stats
R4 Marie PinterovaM. Pinterova	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
Sylvia HanikaS. Hanika	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Australian Open - 24-11-1980
R4 Lindsay MorseL. Morse	W	6-7 6-0 6-0	Stats
R3 Susan LeoS. Leo	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Nagelsen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indian Wells - 21-02-1994
R3 Natalia ZverevaN. Zvereva	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Budapest - 18-10-1993
Q1 Asa CarlssonA. Carlsson	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Montpellier - 11-10-1993
R3 Natalia BaudoneN. Baudone	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 21-06-1993
Q1 Alison SmithA. Smith	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
Q2 Sophie AmiachS. Amiach	L	7-6 6-4	Stats

View All

G. Stevens vs B. Nagelsen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. Stevens	Stats	B. Nagelsen
61.51% (147/92)	YTD Win/Loss	48.97% (356/371)
59.50% (310/211)	Sets Win/Loss	49.59% (850/864)
54.72% (2561/2119)	Games Win/Loss	49.70% (7950/8046)
61.54% (24/15)	Hard Win/Loss	45.45% (90/108)
37.50% (3/5)	Clay Win/Loss	46.81% (44/50)
55.21% (53/43)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.53% (51/78)
77.19% (44/13)	Grass Win/Loss	60.14% (89/59)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
127.9	Average Opponent Rank	203.59
66.67% (2/1)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
75.00% (3/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	80.77% (21/5)
59.46% (22/15)	Futures W/L	37.74% (40/66)
62% (141/227)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (348/712)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (3/3)
0% (0/2)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (5/9)
60% (34/57)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (128/273)
91% (140/128)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (348/281)
9% (140/12)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (348/67)
18% (96/17)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (373/72)